Intransitive Choices Based on Transitive Preferences: the Case of Menu-dependent Information
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper considers decision contexts in which the set of alternatives from which choices have to be made (the 'menu ' ) may convey information about the desirability of these alternatives. Our analysis is motivated by the fact fl~at in specifying an appropriate description of a choice situation an outside observer always has to neglect some 'dimensions ' of the decision problem. The central claim is that properties of observed behaviour may depend crucially on the neglected dimensions even when their influence is arbitrarily small. Specifically, we prove the following resuit. Suppose that in a discrete choice model an agent's beliefs about the 'quality ' of the available alternatives depend on the specific menu to choose from. Then, even when the difference in beliefs given different menus is arbitrarily mnall (but positive), any practicable description of the decision situation necessarily implies that cyclic choices will be observed. The result suggests that t ransi t iv i tyas a condition on observable behaviour is rather questionable in any context where one cannot completely exclude the possibility that menu-dependent information may play some role.
منابع مشابه
On the sufficiency of transitive preferences
The assumption that preferences are transitive, or, roughly equivalently, that choice behavior satisfies the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference, is at the core of much classical normative decision theory. This paper asks to what degree this restricts the possible outcomes of choice behavior: are there objectives that could not be attained by an agent adhering to WARP that could be attained by ch...
متن کاملDo Transitive Preferences Always Result in Indifferent Divisions?
The transitivity of preferences is one of the basic assumptions used in the theory of games and decisions. It is often equated with the rationality of choice and is considered useful in building rankings. Intransitive preferences are considered paradoxical and undesirable. This problem is discussed by many social and natural scientists. A simple model of a sequential game in which two players c...
متن کاملTransitivity in Context: A Rational Analysis of Intransitive Choice and Context-Sensitive Preference
Several apparent violations of transitivity have been reported in the literature on decision making. However, these effects have been shown to be compatible with random preference models, in which preferences are transitive at each point in time but vary at random over time. Such models imply that choice proportions will conform to a set of conditions called the triangle inequalities, and no cl...
متن کاملCommentary: “Neural signatures of intransitive preferences”
Kalenscher et al. (2010) explored the neural signatures of intransitive preferences. This endeavor is of great interest because transitivity of preferences has long been considered a key feature of rationality. The success of this approach hinges upon appropriate methods for identifying decision makers with intransitive preferences. The authors invented a descriptive numerical “index of intrans...
متن کاملNeural Signatures of Intransitive Preferences
It is often assumed that decisions are made by rank-ordering and thus comparing the available choice options based on their subjective values. Rank-ordering requires that the alternatives' subjective values are mentally represented at least on an ordinal scale. Because one alternative cannot be at the same time better and worse than another alternative, choices should satisfy transitivity (if a...
متن کامل